Referring to the opinion of the expert, the issue of OLJC or UUCK No. Legal hermeneutics in interpreting phenomena and law-making processes is to use several methods including explanation, prediction, reasoning, and argumentation to assess the significance of the law (Hart, 1958). Then, the notion of legal hermeneutics can be interpreted as a textual discipline that studies the interpretation and meaning of written law in the context of interpreting phenomena and the process of law-making ( Collier, 2020 in Anggono, 2020). According to Asshidiqie (2020) in (), the application of the idea of the Omnibus Law should not only be limited to issues of licensing and ease of doing business and this law ignores institutional and bureaucratic problems. This opinion is reinforced by Indrati and Asshidiqie (2020) in () stating that the idea of forming an omnibus law is commonly applied in countries that adhere to a common law system, and if omnibus law is applied in countries that if you adopt a civil law system like Indonesia, this will create new problems in the system of drafting laws and regulations. It is better to synchronize and shorten the bureaucracy, so there is no need to make new rules. From the start, the way the preparation of the Job Creation Law seemed rushed and combined inappropriately. OLJC will only waste time and money, because the current problem is in the coordination and supervision of the existing system. However, in this view, Hadjar (2020) in Waseso (2020) has a different opinion. Omnibus Laws is a concept that officially combines or changes laws and regulations into a new form of law that aims to overcome overlapping regulations, and reduce problems in the bureaucracy where both of these are considered or proven to have hampered the implementation of the required policies (Anggono, 2020). 11/2020), ( Undang-Undang Nomor 11 Tahun 2020 tentang Cipta Kerja or UUCK No. 11 of 2020 (Law Number 11 of 2020 concerning Job Creation or UUCK No. This change can be seen in the changes to the Omnibus Law on Jobs Creation (OLJC) or Job Creation Law No.
In this case, changes in the legal order in the reform era are generally directed at accelerating Indonesia’s economic growth, including the employment sector. This is marked by the impetus for implementing stronger democracy and civil governance in various fields, especially in the fields of law and economics. The era of reform in Indonesia has had implications for a more open socio-political environment. The era of reform in Indonesia that occurred in 1998 began when President Suharto resigned on May 21, 1998, and was replaced by the then vice president, B.J.
The contribution of this research is expected to be of special concern to the government and legislators to be wiser in implementing this law, because the benefits and functions of this law are still far from the expectations of the sense of justice of the wider community in Indonesia. OLJC tends to regard labor as a mere factor of production and not as an individual human being with all his values and dignity. 15/2019, and the legal system in Indonesia. The results of this study conclude that OLJC from the perspective of legal hermeneutics is considered very contrary to the philosophy of Pancasila and the 1945 Constitution, Law No. Documents used in the form of scientific contribution data and others that have been published include primary data and secondary data. This research is normative juridical research using the hermeneutic method. This law has become a controversial issue, because the drafting process tends to be very short and rushed and ignores the involvement of the wider community. This study aims to examine and interpret the legal hermeneutics of the Omnibus Law on Job Creation (OLJC) or the Job Creation Law Number 11 of 2020 in Indonesia, especially the labor cluster.
0 kommentar(er)
